Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Raphael Baltensperger vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baltensperger vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Raphael Baltensperger vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Baltensperger 1 - 0 Zima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baltensperger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 41.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baltensperger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 44.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baltensperger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baltensperger has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Zima winning 51.92% (W/L 27/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 46/ 48). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 61/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baltensperger winning 1 times and Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Baltensperger winning 2 and Zima winning 1. The last match between Baltensperger and Zima was at the M15 Horgen, 28-08-2019, First, Clay with Raphael Baltensperger getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baltensperger and Zima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Baltensperger winning 1 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baltensperger winning 0, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baltensperger has played against opponents with an average rank of 124 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 134.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baltensperger has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baltensperger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 41.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
900
Rank
676
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
55% (126-103)
Career Total W/L
55% (158-127)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Raphael Baltensperger vs Leopold Zima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Baltensperger VS Zima
Sportsbook
Offer
Baltensperger VS Zima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Raphael Baltensperger | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (49/81) | 54% (35/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (37/49) | 83% (29/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (19/32) | 53% (16/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (20/65) | 31% (25/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Baltensperger VS Zima H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Leopold Zima
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
1
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Raphael Baltensperger | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (38/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (341/328) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 116.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (717/1057) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (490/717) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (141/340) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (31/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (335/984) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (18/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
41%
(
38 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Baltensperger Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Baltensperger are available here and Zima photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
